Categories
Politics

400 Years

On August 20, 1619–400 years ago tomorrow–a ship named the White Lion docked at Point Comfort, Virginia, and began selling its cargo to the some 700 settlers who then inhabited the British colony of Jamestown. The cargo consisted of the surviving 20 out of an original 350 African captives, kidnapped by the Portuguese from the native Kongo and Ndongo kingdoms, who had survived the arduous transatlantic voyage and then been captured by a plundering ship near Virginia. These twenty people, stolen from their homes and families and transported to a new and unfamiliar continent across the world, began the African population of the American colonies.

Those 20 humans and their millions of descendants would remain in slavery, bought and sold as chattel, for another two-and-a-half centuries, after which they would be denied the full rights of citizens for yet another century, and would continue to struggle for acceptance and equal opportunity for the remaining half century of their residence in this country.

According to the History website,

“The arrival at Point Comfort marked a new chapter in the history of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, which began in the early 1500s and continued into the mid-1800s. The trade uprooted roughly 12 million Africans, depositing roughly 5 million in Brazil and over 3 million in the Caribbean. Though the number of Africans brought to mainland North America was relatively small—roughly 400,000—their labor and that of their descendants was crucial to the economies of the British colonies and, later, the United States.”

The History site also clarifies that technically these 20 people were sold as indentured servants, as were many people from Europe, which means that they would work without pay for a set time in order to pay off their indebtedness and then would gain their freedom. Some in fact were eventually freed; however, as the flourishing southern cash crops demanded great numbers of cheap workers, slavery grew into the institution which was finally ended by President Lincoln 246 years later, but only after a bloody civil war which cost our country roughly 620,000 of its citizens, both black and white. That number is only slightly fewer than the number killed in all of our other wars and conflicts combined (644,000).

Though proponents of the Lost Cause Mythology argue that slavery was not the central cause of the Civil War, that mythology has been debunked by evidence from respected historians. What the Lost Cause folks want us to believe was a battle over states’ rights, others make clear was really a confrontation over only one state right: the right to own slaves. What the Lost Cause people would have us believe is that the Confederacy’s defeat signaled the tragic downfall of a just economic system, which unjustly plunged the South into a period of chaos and rebuilding. Using images of happy dark-skinned people living in peace and harmony on beautiful, sprawling plantations, the Lost Cause Myth makes martyrs of the plantation owners who were deprived of their noble and virtuous way of life.

For perspective, let’s take a look at what the now continental United States of America looked like in 1619. Of course, there was a large Native American population. Although isolated colonies had been settled in North America between 1492 and the early 1600s–mostly Spanish and French–Jamestown, Virginia, was the first permanent British colony and the first stronghold in the region which would become the Thirteen Colonies on which our country was established.

To debunk another myth, not every group of settlers who arrived on these shores was seeking religious freedom or escape from religious persecution. Most of them, and notably Jamestown, came seeking resources (money) and power. Europeans living in densely populated countries saw this new continent as a literal gold mine of free land and all of the wealth that land would yield. Colonial powers saw it as an opportunity for expansion and greater global dominance. Of course, exercising that power and receiving the rewards of their opportunism meant disregarding the one pesky little fact that an estimated 8 million to 112 million native people already lived here in 1492. Those are obviously wildly different numbers, but bear in mind there was no census back then. Whatever the original number, however, it proved no problem for our ambitious ancestors. By 1650, the European colonists had succeeded in reducing the native population to fewer than 6 million. (Statistics from University of Wisconsin Press)

The much-celebrated Pilgrims, British colonists who came here after a brief sojourn in Holland, arrived in 1620 at Plymouth Rock and established the Plymouth Colony in what is now Massachusetts. This group was seeking religious freedom, as was the next major group who arrived in 1630: the Puritans, who settled the Massachusetts Bay Colony. The Puritans, in many ways the strongest English settlement, distinguished themselves for both their theocratic government and their financial success. Although the Puritan work ethic, which became so much a part of our culture, was motivated by service to God, it resulted in great accumulation of wealth for some of those hard workers. It’s worth noting that it took this group only six years to found our nation’s first major university, Harvard, which has been in continuous operation from 1636 until today.

But back to the point: the Africans were here before either of the groups which settled New England; yet while the Pilgrims and Puritans are annually celebrated as the groups to whom we owe our heritage, the Africans continue to be marginalized and suppressed a whole four centuries after their arrival. Those who built the flourishing cotton, tobacco, and sugar trades owed their success to the large masses of cheap labor, but those laborers and their descendants were never granted the respect or monetary reward commensurate with their contributions. And although those dark-skinned laborers have fought in every armed conflict in which this country has engaged, they have not been granted the same recognition, honor, and appreciation as their white comrades in arms.

In 1963, 344 years into our national disgrace, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote this about our failure to extend the “unalienable rights” of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” to a large population whose roots in this country go deeper than the roots of many who do enjoy those rights:

We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights. The nations of Asia and Africa are moving with jetlike speed toward gaining political independence, but we still creep at horse and buggy pace toward gaining a cup of coffee at a lunch counter. Perhaps it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging darts of segregation to say, “Wait.” But when you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim; when you have seen hate filled policemen curse, kick and even kill your black brothers and sisters; when you see the vast majority of your twenty million Negro brothers smothering in an airtight cage of poverty in the midst of an affluent society; when you suddenly find your tongue twisted and your speech stammering as you seek to explain to your six year old daughter why she can’t go to the public amusement park that has just been advertised on television, and see tears welling up in her eyes when she is told that Funtown is closed to colored children, and see ominous clouds of inferiority beginning to form in her little mental sky, and see her beginning to distort her personality by developing an unconscious bitterness toward white people; when you have to concoct an answer for a five year old son who is asking: “Daddy, why do white people treat colored people so mean?”; when you take a cross county drive and find it necessary to sleep night after night in the uncomfortable corners of your automobile because no motel will accept you; when you are humiliated day in and day out by nagging signs reading “white” and “colored”; when your first name becomes “nigger,” your middle name becomes “boy” (however old you are) and your last name becomes “John,” and your wife and mother are never given the respected title “Mrs.”; when you are harried by day and haunted by night by the fact that you are a Negro, living constantly at tiptoe stance, never quite knowing what to expect next, and are plagued with inner fears and outer resentments; when you are forever fighting a degenerating sense of “nobodiness”–then you will understand why we find it difficult to wait.

(Letter from a Birmingham Jail 4/16/1963)

What a powerful statement and what a damning indictment against a country which celebrates itself as a “land of opportunity”!

The questions this statement bring to mind are reminiscent of the questions swirling around our current gun-law debates. Why are we so slow to take needed and reasonable action? Why have other countries solved the problem while we still wallow in the mud of indecision? And above all, what the hell is wrong with us that as citizens of the most powerful country on the globe we can’t resolve problems which other countries put to rest years ago?

As we mark the 400th anniversary of the first African footsteps onto our country’s shores, here’s all we need to know.

Unless you’re descended from one of the original Jamestown families, those African-Americans you see every day can trace their roots in this country further back than you can. Let that sink in. Even if you are a Jamestown descendant, those native people now living on reservations can trace their roots back hundreds or thousands of years further than you can. Bottom line, white people, is that we’re the newcomers. Wielding power over everyone who’s not like us is not our birthright.

The ridiculous fear that we are losing control of “our” nation to intruders is based on logic both convoluted and destructive. White Europeans became the majority population in this country and gained political and social dominance by decimating the native red populations and by building an empire on the backs of enslaved black people whose ancestors were brought here in chains. Your white ancestors, who you might like to believe built this country all by themselves and are therefore alone worthy of our eternal gratitude, might not have survived the first few winters and certainly would not have built the economy that put us on the map without the support from people of color. Nazi Germany was built on the premise that there is a master race and that non-members of that race should be excluded from existence. Have we learned nothing?

Our history as a people is three steps forward, two steps back. We’re in a stepping-back period right now, so it’s the responsibility of the adults in the room to start the forward movement again. We the adults in the room have to speak out against racism wherever we see it; silence is complicity. We have to vote out leaders who promote anything less than equal justice for all, and then we need to make sure we never again vote for anyone who would impede and reverse our forward progress. We have to devote our time, energy, and resources to supporting, in whatever ways we can, organizations that advocate for social justice–both within our borders and beyond.

As a young man (ages 19 and 22), Abraham Lincoln made two flatboat trips along the Mississippi River from his home in Indiana to the mouth of the river in New Orleans, Louisiana. Historians tell us those two trips made an indelible impression on young Lincoln’s mind as he experienced first-hand the horrors of slavery, including a visit to a market where human beings were buying and selling other human beings. Though few specifics of those voyages have been recorded, historians generally agree that their effects may have shaped the thinking which led to the Emancipation Proclamation and the 13th Amendment.

Further study of President Lincoln makes clear that his attitudes toward race, though progressive for his time, were far from the best thinking of Americans a century-and-a-half later. Lincoln was, like all of us, a product of his time. He led important strides toward racial justice in America, but he didn’t solve the whole problem.

It would serve us well to remember that we’re probably not going to solve massive social injustices all by ourselves either, but that can’t stop us from running like hell to get the ball a little closer to the goal post. We may not live to see some future generation score the touchdown, but we can rest in peace knowing we did our part and we left the ball closer to the goal than we found it.

And let us never forget these words of President Lincoln, which I have quoted often and will continue to quote:

“We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory will swell when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.”

Those “better angels” will lead us each day to do whatever small or large thing we can do to keep us moving forward. One thing I’ve done for a while now is just in my daily interactions to be conscious of making eye contact with everyone I meet, especially those who don’t look like me. I give them a genuine smile and a greeting and hope it assures them that their presence is not repugnant or regrettable but welcome and beautiful.

It’s a little thing. I don’t sit in congress. I’m not president. I don’t write laws. But I can smile. And I can say “hello” or “what a beautiful child” or “I love your earrings!” I can bring a moment of light into another human being’s world in which moments of light, warmth, and acceptance may be rare.

I can also write my representatives in government, participate in elections, go to demonstrations, travel to Palestine, and generally raise hell wherever my voice may be heard; and I will not neglect to do those things. But I also won’t neglect to give a smile and a kind word. All we really need is love, right?

Categories
Politics

The Way They Were

They were newlyweds, having just marked their first wedding anniversary. They had an almost six-year-old daughter, a one-year-old daughter, and a two-month-old son; they were just 23 and 24 years old. They dropped off their daughter at cheerleading practice, then headed to Walmart for back-to-school necessities and for party supplies because they had invited their family and friends to help them celebrate their daughter’s birthday and to show off the new house of which they were so proud. His life had turned around when he met her, and they were on course for a happier future. The celebration never happened. Both were shot in the El Paso Walmart, she shielding their baby. The headline read “The baby still had her blood on him.”

He was known as a family man, a grandfather who went to the El Paso Walmart on Saturday morning to take food and water to his granddaughter and her classmates who were there raising money for their soccer team. As soon as the gunfire broke out, he moved to shield his granddaughter. His sister described him in a Facebook post as “a beautiful human being, an excellent dad, uncle, husband and brother.” A cousin said, “He always dedicated himself to his family and his work.” He lived 61 years only to die at the hands of a person who should never have been allowed to own a gun.

He was only six years old, attending a popular Northern California food festival with his mother and his maternal grandmother. The mother received two bullet wounds but survived, as did her mother, the boy’s grandmother. The little one was not so fortunate. His father arrived at the hospital to be told that his son was in critical condition and then five minutes later was notified his son had died. He was just six and a “happy kid,” according to his paternal grandmother who agonizes over the tragic unfairness of a senseless death at such an innocent age.

She was thirteen and also attending the garlic festival. She didn’t keep pace with her family as they fled; she stayed back to walk beside a relative who uses a cane. She died from the bullet that may otherwise have struck the relative.

He was not so innocent. A gang member with a long rap sheet of his own for weapons violations, he was on the scene of a Brooklyn block party when an unknown gunman opened fire. He died and eleven others were injured.

He had worked at a Southaven, Mississippi, Walmart store for about 16 years and had recently become a department manager. He was raising three children before being shot dead in the store’s parking lot. The store manager, father of two, was also killed inside the building. The gunman was a recently fired store employee who left five children fatherless.

According to the New York Times, they were “two were friends from work, enjoying a night on the town. One had recently given birth and was finally getting out of the house. Another had just gotten a new job at a place he loved.” The bar, in Dayton, Ohio, just 20 miles from my hometown–Troy, Ohio–was the scene of much celebration on that carefree Saturday night; that is, until a gunman opened fire and left 9 dead and 27 injured in a matter of seconds. His weapon of choice was a military-style rifle and a large-capacity magazine, thanks to which a total of eight children are grieving the loss of a parent.

Between July 28 and August 4, 2019, 37 people died in the United States of America. The cause? An epidemic outbreak of deadly disease? Tragic unavoidable accidents? A natural disaster, placing them at the mercy of the elements? None of the above. Within that 8-day period, those people died from senseless gun violence. These 37 deaths bring the total for 2019 to 255–which is an average of more than one person per day (CBS News). In addition to the death toll, another 79 people were shot in those same incidents, raising the total number of casualties in just 8 days to 116.

As staggering as those numbers are, they don’t include the number of devastated, grieving family members whose lives have forever changed at the whim of a madman given permission by an irresponsible Congress to own and operate weapons of mass destruction. They also don’t account for the average citizens who are terrified when they hear a car backfire or a large object hit the ground, because we all have lost something in this senseless episode of American history: we’ve lost our sense of safety, trust, and security. We keep tight leashes on our children who will never know the same freedoms we enjoyed in our youth; we’re nervous about normal activities like going shopping, watching a movie in the theater, or even attending our houses of worship. We’re constantly watching our backs because we live in a country where some antiquated amendment is more important than our children and our own peace of mind.

A few days ago, during a visit to New Orleans, I needed Benadryl to counteract an allergic reaction. The package, at Walgreens, was encased in a plastic lock box which could be opened only by a store employee. The security check to board the airplanes which took me to and from New Orleans required me to remove my shoes and in one case to have a minor “pat down” on my back because the metal detector had sensed something.

For years, following the deaths of seven people caused by poisoned Tylenol and the discovery that certain ingredients in over-the-counter cold and allergy medications are used to make methamphetamine (meth), the government has placed restrictions on the amount of a product that can be sold to one customer and have kept the products either in locked cases or in a secure area from which they are retrieved only after a customer has requested them.

I and all of my fellow air travelers now remove our shoes to go through security because in 2001, one terrorist, since known as the Shoe Bomber, attempted to detonate an explosive packed in his shoes during a transatlantic flight. He didn’t even succeed, yet that one botched attempt has affected security measures for air travel these 18 years and counting.

Babies rode in the front seat beside their parents until airbags were added to cars for adults’ protection. Now, because of the danger airbags pose to small people, children are required to ride in the rear seat until they reach the age determined by state laws, in many cases age 13.

In 1995, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols used an ammonium nitrate fertilizer as part of the bomb with which they killed 168 people in Oklahoma City’s Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. According to various websites, restrictions on the sale of that type of fertilizer now include the following: “Anyone buying more than 25 pounds [must] register, be screened against a known terrorist list, and require any thefts to be reported within 24 hours.”

In other locations,

“Under the rules, retailers would have to obtain the name, address, telephone number and driver’s license number of people wanting to purchase ammonium nitrate fertilizer and maintain records, including the date of the sale and the amount purchased, for at least two years.

The administrative guidelines would authorize retailers to refuse to sell ammonium nitrate when it was being purchased out of season, in unusual quantities or in other suspicious circumstances.

The proposal, similar to rules in place in South Carolina and Nevada, is designed to make ammonium nitrate more secure and keep it out of the hands of terrorists, said Kenny Naylor, Fertilizer Program Administrator with the Oklahoma Dept. of Ag, Food & Forestry.”

One fertilizer bombing and people have to be registered, provide contact information, and limit their purchases to restricted amounts. Thirty-seven people killed by gunshot in eight days and nothing is done. Nothing. No. Thing.

Time Magazine recently cited a database of mass shootings compiled by Mother Jones, including the numbers of fatalities and injuries up to and including the recent El Paso and Dayton shootings. During the last 37 years, from 1982 to August, 2019, 114 mass shootings have occurred in the United States (mass shooting is defined as an incident in which at least three people are killed, not including the gunman). In those 114 shootings, 932 have been killed and another 1406 wounded. Most were innocently going about their routine lives: attending school, shopping, enjoying a little entertainment, worshiping. Some had lived long lives, others had barely had a chance to live.

If one botched shoe bombing forever changed air-travel security measures, one fertilizer bombing forever restricted fertilizer sales, and one batch of cyanide-laced Tylenol forever changed the way we purchase over-the-counter drugs, why have we had 114 shootings in 37 years? Why didn’t the first shooting motivate changes that would have prevented many of the others from ever happening? Why have we as a nation sacrificed 932 lives, along with our own sense of security, on the altar of the Second Amendment? Why is unrestricted gun ownership more important to millions of our fellow citizens than people’s lives? Why are universal background checks a greater threat than the possibility of getting killed in the mall, at the theater, at a friendly bar, or at church?

Proposals routinely rejected by Congress include mandating universal background checks; treating guns like cars and requiring registration, training, licensing, and insurance; banning private ownership of assault rifles and any type of weapon designed specifically for military use and mass killing; limiting the amount of ammunition one person can purchase, as is done with fertilizer and over-the-counter drugs; closing loopholes such as online and gun-show purchases. The most haunting and perplexing question of all is, what does anyone have to lose by the implementation of these simple, common-sense restrictions?

I rarely if ever hear anyone at an airport grumbling about removing their shoes, walking through a scanner, or placing their carry-on items in bins for screening; and I never see anyone refuse compliance, at least in part because they know their non-compliance would result in a swift removal from the airport. We’ve accepted these security measures as a normal and necessary part of life, and we willingly comply because we feel safer knowing that everyone with whom we share a plane ride has passed muster.

Yet the very mention of similar restrictions on gun ownership erases every trace of logical thought because of 14 words written 228 years ago by men who could never in their wildest imaginations have envisioned modern weaponry. Our Congress bears the blood of every life that has been sacrificed on the altar of the Second Amendment; but sadly, the citizens who have accepted death as the necessity price for their selfish freedom have blood-stained hands as well.

 If that baby who was orphaned in El Paso, that grandfather whose family is left without a protector and caregiver, that six-year-old who will never experience the milestones of life, and the babies of Sandy Hook who were murdered in their little desks are an acceptable tradeoff for the right to unrestricted gun ownership, we are a despicable people. When taking a knee to protest injustice causes greater outrage than the latest slaughter, we are a people of twisted values. When our only response to human agony is the shallow mantra of “thoughts and prayers,” we are a loathsome lot indeed.

The NRA is funded by its five million members (and possibly some Russian allies), and Congress is funded by the NRA. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the NRA has since 1990 contributed $22,723,137 to electing members of congress and has spent $54,557,564 on lobbying since 1998. The top five recipients of NRA contributions for 2017-2018, according to the same source, are Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), $15,800; Ted Cruz (R-TX), $9,900; John Culberson (R-TX), $9,900; John Faso (R-NY), $9,900; and Josh Hawley (R-MO), $9,900. If you noticed all of the R’s in that sentence, it’s because Democrat candidates receive a small fraction of what is given to Republican candidates.

Of course, Mitch McConnell is also heavily indebted to the gun gods; and not surprisingly, their favorite politico is Donald Trump. Here’s what the Center for Responsive Politics says about him:

“The National Rifle Association’s overall spending surged by more than $100 million in 2016, surpassing any previous annual NRA spending totals on record, according to an audit obtained by the Center for Responsive Politics.

The explosion in spending came as theNRA poured unprecedented amounts of money into efforts to deliver Donald Trump the White House and help Republicans hold both houses of Congress.”

I don’t think we need look any further for the roots of the problem. Sadly, the solution is not quite so clear. However, we have to believe that Jordan and Andre Anchondo, Jorge Cavillo García, Stephen Romero, Keyla Salazar, Brandon Gales, Anthony Brown, Lois Oglesby, and Thomas McNichols–along with the other 923 children, fathers, mothers, grandmothers, grandfathers, spouses, sisters, brothers, and dear friends who have died senselessly in the last 37 years–are worth our continued diligence in fighting the great forces of darkness which have enveloped our nation.

“America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good,

America will cease to be great.”

Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859)